A colour world map, showing density of population. Different regions of the world are coloured in a scheme of black, browns, red, orange and yellow, ranging from very dark brown or black (representing population over 400 persons per square mile) to cream (representing uninhabited regions). The Atlantic Ocean is centred in the world map.

New Appointments: Postdoctoral Fellows

The Laureate Centre for History & Population is delighted to welcome three new postdoctoral fellows. They will be joining us from July 2024.


Matthew Birchall

Matthew Birchall specialises in British imperial history, with a particular focus on chartered companies in colonial Australia and New Zealand. He completed his PhD at the University of Cambridge in 2021. His dissertation, โ€œCompany Colonisation and the Settler Revolution, 1820-1840,โ€ argues that joint-stock companies, rather than the imperial state, were at the vanguard of emigration and colonisation in the wake of the Napoleonic wars. Drawing on a wide range of material in archives scattered across the world โ€“ published writings, parliamentary testimony, company minute books, personal correspondence, and Colonial Office memoranda โ€“ this thesis shows how the company men at the centre of these enterprises imagined, and briefly realised, a corporate empire that stretched across the oceans. Matthewโ€™s thesis was highly commended by the judges of the Australian Historical Societyโ€™s Serle Award. He is reworking the dissertation into a scholarly monograph, tentatively entitled Corporate Conquest: How Companies Built Britainโ€™s Settler Empire, 1815-1850.

At UNSW, Matthew will work on a population-based study of colonial South Australia, Western Australia, and New Zealand. These colonies were established on the economic and social theories of Edward Gibbon Wakefield, an influential English political economist and colonial promoter. He will also lead a project exploring the place of population in the history of global capitalism.

A profile picture of a man. He is wearing a white shirt and smiles at the camera.

Leo Chu

Leo Chu is currently finishing his PhD at the Department of History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Cambridge. His thesis, โ€œHarvesting Diversity: Taiwan, Southeast Asia, and the Transformation of the Green Revolution, 1950-2000,โ€ examines how agronomists, anthropologists, and ecologists shaped agricultural research in the region and how the Cold War developmentalism influenced contemporary discourses of sustainability.

At the Laureate Centre, he will expand the project by analyzing the significance of rural population and family planning in Taiwanโ€™s postwar economic development, and how scientists and officials used Taiwanโ€™s population policies to craft multiple contested ideas of territory and national identity amid shifting geopolitical contexts.

A profile picture of a man. He is wearing a grey-green plaid shirt, with a white lanyard.

Hazal Ozdemir

Hazal Ozdemir is completing her PhD in the History Department of Northwestern University. Her work primarily focuses on migration, displacement, and belonging in the Ottoman and post-Ottoman Middle East. Her dissertation reconstructs late Ottoman policies of denaturalization and shows how surveillance methods devised to control the mobility of a population, including a photographic archive, were a crucial part of a broad repertoire of state violence aimed at Armenian transatlantic migrants. Her second project shifts the focus to the mobility of Armenian women in the aftermath of WWI after nearly two decades of total war and the eradication of Ottoman social welfare sites in the early Turkish Republic. This work considers how Armenian women drew on networks between cities and their hinterlands, developing circular and short-term labor migration as a strategy for economic survival after the de-population of the Armenian community. Before coming to Northwestern, Ozdemir graduated from BoฤŸaziรงi Universityโ€™s (Istanbul, Turkey) Department of History in 2017. She received her master’s degree from the History of Art and Photography program at Birkbeck, University of London.

A profile picture of a woman wearing glasses, a black blazer and gold earings.
A poster for a speaker series. The poster is a brown canvas, with the series title "Populating the 1980s: A decade revisited" centred, with a thin black box around it. The title is in red, with 1980s style font.

Call for Contributions to “Populating the 1980s: a Decade Revisited” Edited Volume


Contributions now invited for the Populating the 1980s: A Decade Revisited edited volume. Contact a.sarcar@unsw.edu.au for more information.


About:

For global negotiations over the population, the 1980s was a bridging decade. In the 1970s, population control through โ€œfamily planningโ€ as a development aid program boomed and waned. In the 1990s, the rhetoric of human and environmental rights was fully embedded in the policy discussion of the global population trend. What, then, marked the 1980s in terms of the global, regional, national, and local level discussions on population? Were there population practices specific to the decade? Was the 1980s really a bridging decade or can we characterize it in alternative ways? What insights would the perspective on the 1980s bring to the historiography? Populating the 1980s: A Decade Revisited aims to engage with these questions.

In addition to this, Populating the 1980s aims to address the lacunae created by the existing scholarship. Historians know much about population politics until the 1980s. Social scientific work has dominated the relevant scholarship since. Through Populating the 1980s we also aim to “populate” the historiography of this understudied period.

We are seeking contributors to Populating the 1980s: A Decade Revisited. We invite proposals that engage with historical scholarship on population politics and with topics including but not limited to:

  • Family planning in primary health, in particular maternal and child health
  • Eugenics and/or population quality
  • Population quantity and mobility
  • Feminist engagement with population politics
  • The pro-life vs pro-choice politics
  • Neoliberalisation
  • Reproductive technologies
  • Environment, resource, and population
  • Fertility decline
  • Chinaโ€™s one-child policy
  • The 1984 United Nations International Conference on Population in Mexico City

Please submit paper proposals which include: a title, abstract (300 words maximum), and a short CV (150 words maximum) to Aprajita Sarcar (a.sarcar@unsw.edu.au) by March 5th, 2024.

A poster for a speaker series. The poster is a brown canvas, with the series title "Populating the 1980s: A decade revisited" centred, with a thin black box around it. The title is in red, with 1980s style font.

Populating the 1980s: Catch up on the series so far

Our “Populating the 1980s: A decade revisited” online seminar series has wrapped for 2023, and will be returning in March 2024. The series, convened by Dr Aprajita Sarcar, considers the afterlife of demographic transition in different political geographies. Asking whether 1980s population policy should be read as an artifact of previous decades, or a new field in itself, the series brings together scholars to re-theorise population policy and discourse in this often-understudied decade.

Speakers for 2023 included Mytheli Sreenivas on South Asia, Sanjam Ahluwalia on India, Aya Homei on Japan, Raรบl Antonio Necochea on Peru, and Sarah Mellors Rodriguez on China. Their presentations are now all available to watch below and on the series page.

Populating the 1980s will return on the 27th March 2024, with Alison Bashford speaking on โ€Demographic Transition as an Artefact: Ten Years of Global Population โ€“ History, Geopolitics & Life on Earth & Everything in Betweenโ€. Register via eventbrite: https://www.eventbrite.com.au/e/populating-the-1980s-a-decade-revisited-tickets-559321655127


29 March 2023, Mytheli Sreenivas (Ohio State), โ€œSouth Asia, Population Planning and National Imaginations: A Discussion on Method and Periodizationโ€

In our first session of the “Populating the 1980s” series Professor Mytheli Sreenivas (Ohio State) was joined by Darshi Thoradeniya (University of Colombo) and Amna Qayyum, to discuss reproductive politics in South Asia. 


26 April 2023, Sanjam Ahluwalia (Northern Arizona University), โ€œEntertainment Interruptus: Films Division of Indiaโ€™s Messaging on Population Control, Family Planning, and Happiness, in the 1980sโ€

In the second session of the โ€œPopulating the 1980sโ€ series, we welcomed Associate Professor Sanjam Ahluwalia (Northern Arizona University), who discussed the use of films to propagate family planning messages in India in the 1980s.


24 May 2023, Aya Homei (Manchester University), โ€œUnder the Name of Friendship: Population Politics & Sino-Japanese Cooperation in Family Planning in the 1980sโ€

In our third session of the “Populating the 1980s” series, Dr Aya Homei (Manchester University) joins Dr Aprajita Sarcar (UNSW) to discuss Sino-Japanese cooperation on family planning in the 1980s. 


11 October 2023, Raรบl Antonio Necochea (University of North California), โ€œFrom Demographic to Discursive Explosion: New Players & Priorities in 1980s Peruโ€

In our fourth session of the “Populating the 1980s” series, Associate Professor Raรบl Antonio Necochea (Uni. of North California) joined Dr Aprajita Sarcar to discuss demographic debates in 1980s Peru. 


15 November 2023, Sarah Mellors Rodriguez (Missouri State University), โ€œFrom Pronatalism to Just One Child and Back Again: The Making and Unmaking of Chinaโ€™s One Child Policyโ€

In our fifth session of the “Populating the 1980s” series, Associate Professor Sarah Mellors Rodriguez (Missouri State University) discussed the evolution of Chinaโ€™s reproductive politics since the 1980s. Her paper is entitled: “From Pronatalism to Just One Child and Back: The Making and Unmaking of Chinaโ€™s One Child Policy.”


An image showing the cover of Alison Bashford's book, on display at the award ceremony

An Intimate History of Evolution wins the 2023 Mark & Evette Moran Nib Literary Award

Centre Director Alison Bashford’s latest book, An Intimate History of Evolution: The story of the Huxley family has won the 2023 Mark & Evette Moran Nib Literary Award.

The Mark & Evette Moran Nib Literary Award recognises works that combine excellence in research, literary merit, readability and value to the community, and is presented by the Waverley Council. You can read more about the awards, and view the full long and short lists via the Waverley Council website.

An Intimate History of Evolution tells the story of the Huxleys: the Victorian natural historian T H Huxley, and his grandson, the scientist, conservationist, and zoologist Julian Huxley. Between them, the Huxleys communicated to the world the story of the theory of evolution by natural selection. It is published by University of Chicago Press & Allen Lane, and is available for purchase via the University of Chicago Press website.

The 2023 Mark & Evette Moran Nib Literary Award was announced at the Bondi Pavilion on the 9th November 2023. Photos courtesy of Waverley Council.

A sunset over Sydney harbour, taken from the Q Station in Manly. To the right, there is an old Q-Station building constructed from wood and corrugated iron. In the foreground, framing the image, are two eucalyptus trees.

July @ the Laureate Centre

In July 2023, the Laureate Centre was delighted to welcome distinguished visiting scholars Prof Duncan Kelly & Prof David Nally from Cambridge, who joined conversations on population & the anthropocene, and helped workshop papers with Laureate Centre & affiliated researchers.

Population and the Anthropocene Workshop, 20th July

This half-day discussion brought together scholars from UNSW Environment & Society with Alison Bashford, Prof Duncan Kelly and Prof David Nally to ask how scholars think about population and its history in the Anthropocene, especially given its primacy in the indicators of a great acceleration since 1950s.


‘Festival of Ideas,’ Quarantine Station (Sydney), 25-26th July

Laureate Centre & affiliated researchers gathered at the Quarantine Station, Sydney, to workshop papers on population policy, health & medical history, quarantine, immigration and more. The intensive, two days of discussion included a tour of the historic Quarantine Station grounds led by Centre Director Alison Bashford.

A picture of the front cover of a book, with its title "The Huxleys: An Intimate History of Evolution" centred. To the left is a man holding a cup. To the right is a chimpanzee. They are facing each other, as if in conversation.

Prize Nominations For The Huxleys: An Intimate History of Evolution

Professor Alison Bashford’s book The Huxleys: An Intimate History of Evolution (Allen Lane/University of Chicago Press) has been longlisted for two awards: the 2023 Cundill History Prize and the 2023 Mark and Evette Moran Nib Literary Award, and shortlisted for the British Society for the History of Science’s 2023 Hughes Prize.

Bashford’s book charts 200 years of modern science and culture through the Huxley family.

The respective long and short lists for these awards are available by following the links below:

2023 Cundill History Prize Longlist

2023 Mark and Evette Moran Nib Literary Award

British Society for the History of Science, Hughes Prize Shortlist

For more details about The Huxleys: An Intimate History of Evolution, or to purchase a copy of the book, visit the University of Chicago Press website.

Update: 4 September 2023, The Huxleys: An Intimate History of Evolution has now been shortlisted for the Mark & Evette Moran Nib Literary Award.

Update: 28 September 2023, The Huxleys: An Intimate History of Evolution has now been shortlisted for the Cundill History Prize.


A picture of the front cover of a book, with its title "The Huxleys: An Intimate History of Evolution" centred. To the left is a man holding a cup. To the right is a chimpanzee. They are facing each other, as if in conversation.

A poster for the "Population Through the Camera" series. The poster is blue, with an aerial shot of a coastline in the background. In the foreground there is a camera, with a while line running through it. The poster includes the title and date for the workshop: "Population Through the Camera: Scenes and Subjects from the Asia-Pacific," 15 March 2023, UNSW Sydney. As well as the list of speakers. This information is written in white.

What We Are Talking About: Population Through the Camera

At the recent โ€œPopulation Through the Cameraโ€ workshop, organised by the Laureate Centre for History and Population at UNSW, scholars from diverse backgrounds discussed how photography sees and unsees populations within a landscape. The workshop concentrated on the Asia-Pacific region, where modern histories of population transfer, colonialism, and photography are set against complex backgrounds of settler expansion, environmental change, economic exploitation, and civilising missions. Particular themes that resonated across all papers were the use of photographs to erase or emphasis certain demographics in an environment, the photographsโ€™ (at times ambiguous) archival context, and the broader role of photography in colonial and settler projects.

Anne Maxwell, the keynote speaker, started the day by introducing us to a series of six female settler photographers active in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, discussing how they chose to present the land they inhabited as well as its original inhabitants. Few women had access to this new technology and the likenesses they produced were shaped in part by social restrictions in who they could photograph and how they could approach their subject matter. Interestingly, Maxwell showed that even within this small cohort, photography was pursued for a range of reasons: artistic, financial, and political. A central argument through her presentation and indeed throughout the day was how the act of photography facilitated the narratives of settler and colonial communities. These ranged from a โ€œgenteel forgettingโ€ of indigenous communities that inhabited supposedly โ€œemptyโ€ landscapes, through the insertion of indigenous labour as an extension of colonial development projects, to the foregrounding and celebration of settler populations against transformed landscapes. How, for instance, Maxwell asked, does a collage of white children presented as โ€œGems of Victoriaโ€ erase the presence of a much larger indigenous population in this Australian state? And what do we make of the portrait photograph of a smiling Mฤori woman from the oeuvre of one female photographer from which indigenous populations are otherwise largely absent? Her presence in this set of photographs is significant both because of its singularity and because it reminds us to critically assess the archive as a whole.

In fact, all speakers grappled with questions about the archive. Where do photographs sit within archives often made up primarily of textual sources? Or how should we read series and individual snapshots? Jarrod Hore and Maurits Meerwijk considered photographic archives created to support a singular perspective: produced by individual photographers for commercial albums or different photographers to accompany government reports. Chi Chi Huang, Suzanne Claridge, and Emma Thomasโ€™ photographs were produced more incidentally and over time. Some were destined for the archive, others were not. Many of these photographs had complex lives: removed from albums, decontextualised, and reproduced to suit new narratives. For example, Huang traced the reproduction of one photograph of a Chinese street originally taken by John Thompson over a period of three decades. It gained new meanings with each iteration, begging the question: to which archive does this photograph belong?

From here, a recurring question was how these photographs were organised and captioned. It became evident across all papers that captions subtly direct the gaze of the observer toward overarching narratives of colonial relations between people and the land. For instance, photographs of โ€œpaydayโ€ on a Fijian plantation in Claridgeโ€™s presentation obscured the indentured nature of the migrant workers photographed. Similarly, the parentheses around the word โ€œlabourโ€ in the caption of a photograph by Alfred Burton in one of his commercial albums discussed by Hore, transformed a group of Fijians from the original inhabitants of the island into an economic resource โ€“ much like the landscape behind them.

In fact, the violent and exploitative nature of settler and colonial life as captured by the camera was a dominant theme throughout our discussions. Maxwellโ€™s photographs of settler landscapes from which local populations had been forcibly removed offered an oblique perspective on such violence. More blatantly, such exploitation was immediately visible in Thomasโ€™ discussion of indigenous female labour in photographs from German New Guinea. The composition and editing of the womenโ€™s bodies captured the gendered and racialised nature of colonial power and its inherent violence. Interestingly, it is precisely because of the rarity of these images that the erased presence of female labour in German New Guinea becomes all the more powerful and striking.   

Finally, in Meerwijkโ€™s photographs of โ€œhealthy publicsโ€ in the Dutch East Indies receiving medical care from a โ€œbenignโ€ colonial state contain subtle overtones of coercion and violence. Orderly queues of demographically organised subjects suggest discipline, surveillance, and local appreciation for Western-style medical intervention among a much larger population โ€“ while the subtle presence of uniformed law enforcers in the background of many photographs suggests the coercive nature of many such encounters.

Frequently histories of population focus on the implementation and impact of policies and programs, but what this workshop has shown is the power of the camera to guide those conversations. A special issue is currently being planned from this workshop. It will be led by Jarrod Hore and Chi Chi Huang.

A woman holding a flag. The picture is in a stencil style, with minimal details and large filled areas, as though composed by printing with blocks.

The World at Six Billion

By Priyanka Nandy, 23 November 2022


โ€˜The Day of the Six Billionโ€™ โ€“ observed by the United Nation on 12 October 1998 โ€“ came twelve short years after the five-billion mark, making it the fastest recorded billion-growth at the time. Eventually, both the seventh and eighth billion would take twelve years each as well, tying with the sixth for the โ€˜fastest billionthโ€™ spot. 

Cracks in the fear of โ€˜overpopulationโ€™

With longitudinal datasets and more robust demographic modelling, the six-billion milestone marked the first cracks in global anxiety about rapid and unchecked population growth. โ€œNever before have birthrates fallen so far, so fast, so low, for so long, all around the world,โ€ the Washington Post stated, quoting the otherwise-conservative demographer Ben Wattenberg.

Writing simultaneously, the New York Times remarked that โ€œsix billion actually represents significant progress in reducing birth rate [in a single generation]โ€ โ€“ from 2.8 to 1.6 in industrialised nations, and 6.2 to below 3 in the developing world. โ€œThis scenario,โ€ it asserts, โ€œis a far cry from the dire predictions about the population explosion commonly made in the 1960s.โ€

Indeed, in September of that year the NYT published a rather acerbic piece titled, โ€œWhy Malthus was Wrongโ€, declaring that Malthusian fears of population-doubling and resource-scarcity were โ€œan enduring source of error and self-bamboozlementโ€. The persistent โ€œspectre of overpopulationโ€, it said, could no longer be supported by demographic data.

“Never before have birthrates fallen so far, so fast, so low, for so long, all around the world”

Ben Wattenberg, cited in the Washington Post, 7 February 1999

What led to falling fertility? Women, Population, and Development

โ€œOne of the great lessons learned in the past three decades,โ€ notes a NYT opinion-piece on the sixth billion, โ€œis that controlling population growth is inextricably tied to development strategies that improve gender equityโ€ฆ and give women more economic power.โ€

This realisation had a rather slow history. Despite an ongoing parallel discourse on womenโ€™s rights (including the establishment of International Womenโ€™s Year, World Conferences on Women, and the UN Decade for Women), for several postwar decades women from the global south were chiefly seen as recipients of food-aid, contraceptives, and quota-driven sterilisation. Even development-focused family-planning movements, as represented by the International Conferences on Population and Development, limited themselves to โ€œsimply doling out contraceptivesโ€ or meeting sterilisation-quotas (Washington Post 1999). Southern womenโ€™s agency within the โ€˜population controlโ€™ process was either not acknowledged or defined, much less operationalised.

Movements that did focus on womenโ€™s economic emancipation, on the other hand, failed to take into account the added burden of their reproductive labour. The pivotal WID-WAD-GAD movement of women-centric development, for example โ€“ kickstarted within the UN infrastructure by Ester Boserupโ€™s seminal Womenโ€™s Role in Economic Development and spanning the fourth, fifth, and sixth-billion milestones โ€“ was severely criticised during its first two phases (WID, WAD) for failing to acknowledge the effect that traditional gendered labour had on womenโ€™s reproductive autonomy.

The mid-1990s saw โ€œno less than a revolutionโ€ in these attitudes, according to a 2004 UN Press Release. The 1994 Cairo Conference explicitly connected the threads of poverty, unpaid gendered labour, gender-unequal access to education and employment and gendered violence, to womenโ€™s lack of agency in reproduction. As a solution, it removed such prescriptive measures as national sterilisation quotas, and refocused fertility-interventions on girlsโ€™ education, womenโ€™s employment, combatting violence against women, improving outcomes in maternal and child health, and promoting family-planning education in addition to distributing contraceptives. The year after the sixth-billion mark, many of these goals were incorporated into the United Nationsโ€™ Millennium Development Goals.

Inequality at 6 billion: Lingering concerns

While sustained global activism in the area of gender equality did bring about the โ€œrevolutionaryโ€ and โ€œambitiousโ€ changes of the Cairo Conference (Washington Post 1999), the sixth-billion milestone also raised concerns about a deeply-unequal worldโ€™s ability to meet them. The Washington Post noted grimly that in the five years since Cairo, โ€œthe world has made no dent in maternal deathsโ€ and that there is โ€œconsiderable resistance in many countries toโ€ฆ boosting the status of womenโ€. The New York Times shares this view, emphasising that nearly 600,000 women still die annually during pregnancy because of inadequate awareness and access to health services, and 350 million have no access to effective contraception at all.

The overriding concern, however, was the โ€œmassive shortfall in fundingโ€ โ€“ owing in part to the Asian economic crisis, in part to โ€œanti-abortion forces in the [United States] congressโ€ฆ holding up funding for international family planningโ€ (NYT 1999), but chiefly โ€“ the WaPo suggests โ€“ to the โ€œthe worldโ€™s richest countriesโ€ seeing the โ€˜population problemโ€™ as an issue for the global south to solve, and paying less than one-third of their pledge in Cairo. Unless these pledges are paid in full, both pieces warned, โ€œthe next billion people may be consigned to lives of privation in countries where resources are already stretched to the limit (NYT 1999)โ€, becoming โ€œa major threat to health, the environmentโ€ฆ and the world economyโ€ (WaPo 1999).

Democracy or authoritarianism?

An interesting footnote to this multifaceted discussion is a debate on modes of governance. In her piece on India and China at the sixth billion, NYTโ€™s UN Bureau Chief Barbara Crossette wondered if democracy is as good for the global south as it is for โ€œthe Free Worldโ€. โ€œDemocratic India has not delivered on its promise of a better life for most Indians,โ€ she noted, whereas โ€œauthoritarian China has done much better on that scoreโ€. Similarly, she suggested, military rule in Bangladesh and Indonesia had enforced development and family-planning programmes, whereas in a democracy โ€œsuch measures have to have some popular supportโ€. Referring to Amartya Senโ€™s Development as Freedom, Crossette seems to suggest that authoritarian regimes that impose development as a form of freedom on its citizens might be preferable to a government that has to convince its politically-free citizens to vote for their own improvement.

Coming as it did at the conclusion of an unprecedented period of fighting for gendered liberty, empowerment and equal rights, this was certainly an interesting hypothesis, and one that would gain considerable political mileage in the decades to come.

Priyanka Nandy is a PhD candidate at the Laureate Centre for History and Population, UNSW Sydney.

A poster, from 1914, in German. It features a woman holding a red flag, raised up, blowing behind her.

Cover image: Karl Maria Stadler (1888-1943), Deutsch: Plakat der Frauenbewegung zum Frauentag 8. Mรคrz 1914. Es wird das Frauenwahlrecht gefordert. English: Poster for Women’s Day, March 8, 1914, demanding voting rights for women. (Public Domain). Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frauentag_1914_Heraus_mit_dem_Frauenwahlrecht.jpg

8 Billion From The Middle East and North Africa: Between Life and Death in the Human Boiler

Stephen Pascoe, 15 November 2022

Nโ€™entendez-vous pas sur la Cรดte dโ€™Azur les cris qui nous parviennent de lโ€™autre bout de la Mรฉditerranรฉe, dโ€™Egypte ou de Tunisie ? Pensez-vous quโ€™il ne sโ€™agit que de rรฉvolution de palais ou grondement de quelques ambitieux, en quรชte de place ? Non, non, la pression augmente constamment dans la chaudiรจre humaine.

Sauvy, Alfred. โ€œTrois mondes, une planรจte.โ€ Lโ€™Observateur, 14 August 1952.

News of the birth of the planetโ€™s eighth billion human will provoke a mixture of intellectual and emotional responses, among them awe, fascination, hope and bewilderment. For many, the dominant feeling will be one of alarm: that the coming milestone is a portent of a human mass spun out of control. Interlocked with the climate crisis, and an ever more alarming set of predictions about the prospects for human life on this overheated planet, the imposing figure appears as the landmark of a humanity that has well surpassed its limits to growth.

Not so long ago, another milestone โ€” of the global urban population outstripping its rural equivalent for the first time in human history โ€” was greeted in some quarters as cause for qualified optimism. The argument went that city-dwellers, per capita, use fewer resources than their counterparts in the countryside, occupy less land, and achieve economies of scale impossible in areas of lower population density. This prognosis, while containing a kernel of truth, overlooked the devil in the detail. It glossed the way that each and every human community, whether rural or urban (or somewhere in between), is always constrained by its access to food and resources within global supply chains, as well as by the inequalities of uneven development and by localised environmental conditions. In a word, such urban optimism was blind to geography.

The uncomfortable truth, then as now, is that the inhabitants of different regions will not share the same fates in our ecologically precarious futures. Among the planetโ€™s sociocultural blocs, the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) occupies an especially paradoxical position. The region is often made to stand as a cautionary tale for the rest of the world in the stakes of climate change; advance warning of what awaits other regions as temperatures rise, rainfall declines and aridity increases. Some pundits suggest that parts of the region are already uninhabitable, especially during the summer months which year upon recent year have seen heat records smashed. The gulf between the air-conditioned population and their opposite has been exacerbated by electricity crises in Lebanon and in Iraq, in both countries spurring popular uprisings in 2019 that are far from settled. Anticipated water shortages across the region will likely provoke further unrest in coming years.[1]

And yet, the still inexhausted supplies of hydrocarbons in the region โ€” at once at the origin of much of our planetary woes and still powering the majority of global economies โ€” have made the oil-producing countries politically un-abandonable. The perilous entanglement of American global power with petrochemical autocracies has fuelled a culture of permanent war and circumvented meaningful democratic reform or energy transition.[2] The MENA region thus remains central to our collective global futures, and in the ways of life sustained by possible energy regimes, for better or for worse. 

The region has long been central to the articulation and framing of urgent global questions. When the French demographer Alfred Sauvy invented the โ€œthird worldโ€ in 1952 as an alternative to the rival capitalist and communist spheres that had emerged in the cauldron of the Cold War, he had his eyes (and ears) firmly on the Middle East. Writing in the weeks following the Egyptian revolution that brought Gamal Abd-El Nasser to power, Sauvy asked his French audience: โ€œDo you not hear, from the Cรดte dโ€™Azur, the cries that reach us from the other side of the Mediterranean, from Egypt or Tunisia?โ€ Against those who might see the revolutionary struggle of this decolonizing age as simply โ€œpalace revolutionsโ€ or the rumblings of a few ambitious upstarts, Sauvy saw them instead as expressions of a pressure that was โ€œrising constantly in the human boilerโ€.[3] Sauvy meant chaudiรจre in the sense of a pressure cooker, demanding a release valve both political and demographic. Reading his text seventy years later, la chaudiรจre humaine now assumes a grislier apparition: the โ€œhuman boilerโ€ has become the earth itself.

The eighth billion human is expected to be born today, on the 15th of November 2022.[4] The child will thus come into the world at precisely the moment that Egypt will be hosting the COP 27, the โ€œlast chance to achieve a healthy future for humanityโ€, according to the World Health Organization.[5] The conference will be held in the glittering Red Sea resort town of Sharm El-Shaykh, at a comfortable distance from the unruly conurbation of Cairo, that โ€œmassive collision between the rural and the urbanโ€[6] that straddles the Nile Delta with an effective population approaching twenty-two million. The conference will be held under the auspices of a government that has stifled dissent, jailed environmental activists and quashed the remnants of the popular revolutionary currents that sought to deliver Egypt from authoritarian repression a decade ago.[7] The most prominent of the political prisoners, Alaa Abd El-Fattah, on hunger strike for several months, has vowed to stop drinking water on the day that the conference begins in order to escalate his demands for individual freedom and collective political reform.[8] By the end of the conference, El-Fattah anticipates that he will be either dead or free.


An image of a beach in Sharm el-Sheikh. In the foreground is a beach filled with colourful rugs and places to sit. There's a calm and bright blue ocean visible in the background.

COP27 is taking place in Sharm El-Shaykh. Image: Unsplash.


Travelling from the COP27 convention centre in Sharm El-Shaykh in two distinct directions, one finds two vastly different sites, which hint at the disparate futures of the region. Crossing the Sinai Peninsula to the Gaza strip, can be found one of the highest population densities in the world.[9] The population in question is comprised chiefly of the descendants of Palestinians cleared from their land and their homes to make way for the establishment of Israel in 1948 and systematically barred from returning ever since. Faced with acute land and housing shortages, it has recently been reported that some Gaza residents with nowhere else to go have taken to living in cemeteries, making shelter among the graves.[10] Scarcely a more apt metaphor for the stranglehold of the past on the present could be imagined. Here, the unresolved traumas of the twentieth century suffocate the lives of the twenty-first century.

Taking an alternate itinerary from Sharm Elโ€“Shaykh, across the Red Sea, one lands on an entirely different vision of the future. In the northwest of Saudi Arabia, excavators are currently โ€œdigging a wide linear trench in the desert,โ€ clearing sand to make way for โ€œThe Lineโ€, or Neom.[11] This piece of utopian futurism envisages a linear city of 170 kilometres, buttressed on each side by a mirrored glass โ€œearthscaperโ€ reflecting light back on the desert, while housing nine million residents inside amidst a cacophony of forests, high-speed rail, vertical gardens growing fruit and vegetables harvested by robots and various amenities for residents.[12] While the project has been greeted with scepticism and incredulity by urban planners and architects, as an attempt to greenwash the appalling human rights record of the country under Crown Prince Muhammad Bin Sultan, the bulldozers push on through the sands of the desert.

As we eight billion humans hurtle into ever more unstable set of ecological horizons, it is perhaps in this respect that the MENA best suggests the outlines of the future. It is of a planet divided, not so clearly along regional lines or in clearly demarcated hemispheres, but between those zones of privilege building their way out of crisis in insulated and fortressed worlds for the privileged, sitting uncomfortably alongside what the recently departed urban scholar Mike Davis famously called โ€œa planet of slumsโ€, where the many billions are left to fend for themselves. 

Stephen Pascoe is a Research Fellow at the Laureate Centre for History and Population, UNSW Sydney. Cover image: Unsplash.


[1] Anchal Vohra, โ€œThe Middle East is Becoming Literally Uninhabitableโ€, Foreign Policy, 24 August 2021. Jamie Fico, โ€œWhat happens to oasis farming when the water runs out?โ€, Jadaliyya, 15 December 2021.

[2] Jacob Mundy, โ€œOil for Insecurity, Permanent War, and the Political Economy of Late Imperial America,โ€ in Daniel Bertrand Monk and Michael Sorkin (eds.), Between Catastrophe and Revolution: Essays in Honor of Mike Davis (New York and London: OR Books, 2021), 161โ€“191. Cf. Omar Robert Hamilton, โ€œBefore the COP: Sustainable power,โ€ Madamasr, June 16, 2022.

[3] Alfred Sauvy, โ€œTrois mondes, une planรจte,โ€ Lโ€™Observateur, 14 August 1952.

[4] โ€œWorld set to reach 8 billion people on 15 November 2022,โ€ United Nations Population Fund, 11 July 2022.

[5] โ€œWhat is at stake at COP27? Our last chance to achieve a healthy future for humanity,โ€ Statement by the WHO Council on the Economics of Health for All, 13 October 2022.

[6] Mike Davis, Planet of Slums (London and New York: Verso, 2017), 9.

[7] Naomi Klein, โ€œGreenwashing a police state: the truth behind Egyptโ€™s Cop27 masquerade,โ€ The Guardian, 18 October 2022. 

[8] โ€œCOP27, Alaa Abd El-Fattah and the Dreams of the Revolution โ€“ A Conversation with Omar Robert Hamilton and Ashish Ghadiali,โ€ Middle East Report and Information Project, November 4, 2022.

[9] Adam Taylor, โ€œGaza City is being hit by missile strikes. This is how densely populated it is,โ€ The Washington Post, July 14, 2014.

[10] โ€œGaza struggles to accommodate the living and the dead,โ€ Al Jazeera, 6 October 2022.

[11] Tom Ravenscroft, โ€œDrone footage reveals The Line megacity under construction in Saudi Arabia,โ€ Dezeen, 19 October 2022.

[12] Jenny Southan, โ€œThe Line: Saudi Arabia to build 170km long โ€˜Earthscaperโ€™ City,โ€ Globetrender, July 27, 2022.

A black and white image of a densely-packed crowd. They are all facing in the same direction, as though gathered waiting for something.

The World at 5 Billion

Priyanka Nandy, 16 November 2022


โ€˜The Day of Five Billionโ€™ โ€“ marked on 11 July 1987, and celebrated as World Population Day since 1989 โ€“ was the first precisely-dated population milestone that was predicted before it happened. The third and fourth billion milestones, in 1960 and 1974 respectively, had not been attached to a specific date (indeed, per the United Nations, not even to a specific month). 

Retrospectively, 1987 also marked the end of the postwar โ€œglobal baby boomโ€: a period between 1950 and 1987 where global population doubled faster than ever recorded in human history โ€“ from two-and-a-half billion to five billion in just thirty-seven years. The previous doubling (one to two billion) had taken one hundred and twenty-three years. The next doubling (three to six billion) took only a year longer, but the doubling after that (four to eight billion) took forty-eight years โ€“ a significant lengthening.  

The fifth billion was also the first population milestone that marked a smallโ€”but very significantโ€” departure from the authoritarian birth-control discourse surrounding population growth in the forties, fifties and sixties.

Before the 5 Billion: Contradictions, confusion, and bias-afflicted science

In the fifties and sixties, existing fears of a neoMalthusian ecological apocalypse โ€“ triggered in popular consciousness by Fairfield Osbornโ€™s and William Vogtโ€™s 1948 popular-science bestsellers, Our Plundered Planet and Road to Survival โ€“ were further propagated by the pamphleteering of Hugh Everett Moore (โ€œThe Population Bomb!โ€), evocative human-interest stories of population and poverty (see, for instance, the Times cover story from 11 January 1960, โ€œPopulation: A Numbers Gameโ€), and alarmist science-adjacent literature such as William and Paul Paddock (Famine 1976!), Heinz von Foersterโ€™s doomsday equation (which predicted an uncountable, infinite population on Earth by 2026), and, of course, Paul and Anne Ehrlichโ€™s The Population Bomb โ€“ labelled by the Smithsonian Magazine as โ€œthe book that incited a worldwide fear of populationโ€.

The general fear of โ€œoverpopulationโ€ was compounded by the specific fear that โ€œAfro-Asian nations in the U.N.โ€ โ€“ many of which were impoverished postcolonies with large populations โ€“ would โ€œturn more violently against the Westโ€ unless they were โ€œpacified with rapid economic helpโ€ (Times 1960). There were further concerns that any attempts at encouraging birth control in these โ€œpoor nationsโ€ would be met with religious and cultural resistance. Indeed, fear of local aggression (or ill-informed recalcitrance, or both) featured prominently in most discourses of demography and development, such as land-engineering for the purposes of population redistribution. Populating โ€œvast tracts of [fertile] empty landโ€ โ€“ such as the jungles of Amazon, Sumatra, or Uganda โ€“ with โ€˜excessโ€™ non-white population was a popular idea during this period, as was the idea of forcibly relocating people from their traditional communities to commercial farms as labourers (Times 1960). All of these were conceptualised as tools of greater global good, and local communitiesโ€™ resistance to them often inspired harsh responses, such as the Paddocksโ€™ and Ehrlichsโ€™ idea of triage: letting the poorest populations, incapable of feeding themselves, starve to death.

In the seventies, however, both anglophone academia and media were influenced by the emerging concept of political ecology โ€“ a framework of analysis that focused on the political and socioeconomic roots of global ecological degradation. During the seventies and eighties, the framework revisited demographic alarmism through the lens of material consumption, and demonstrated that the carbon footprint of the global north was at least as draining to the environment as overpopulation in the global south.

A transition to new ideas of power, politics, and population

By 1987, many of the older ideas had been retired from mainstream media. Population in China remained a central concern for the American media, whether it was concern for a re-rise in its population, short histories of its one child policy, or its social ramification. But the core of the conversation had begun a slow pivot towards the environmental consequences of mass-consumption. Environmentalist Norman Myers, in his Guardian piece on the five-billion milestone, is firm about dispelling the prevalent idea that the impoverished billions are responsible for destabilising global ecology. Using the five-billionth baby as an illustration of unequal access and unequal capacity for environmental damage โ€“ and also for underlining the difference between resource use and resource wastage โ€“ Myers points out that if the baby is born American, then โ€œit would waste more energy in its lifetime than 20 Kenyans would ever consumeโ€. By implication, if born Kenyan, they would have no opportunity to participate in such wastefulness.

Beneath these new empirical attitudes, however, traces of older fears are still visible. Though asserting that the greenhouse effect has been caused entirely by western โ€œfossil fuel bingeโ€ and industrial farming, Myers reverts to population control โ€“ and only population control โ€“ as its solution. And he frames this solution in words that are strongly reminiscent of the Timesโ€™ fears of โ€œAfro-Asian countriesโ€. Estimating that meeting global contraceptive needs amounts to only one-third of one dayโ€™s global military spending, he asks his western readers, โ€œWhich would buy us more all-round security?โ€

And thus the growing population of the global south is reframed, even within a discourse of โ€˜modernโ€™ environmental thinking, as a biosecurity risk.

In our discussion of future population milestones, we shall explore how โ€“ if at all โ€“ this anxiety of being numerically, economically, and culturally overwhelmed has affected global population policy, and how it has interacted with other demographic determinants.

Priyanka Nandy is a PhD Candidate at the Laureate Centre for History and Population, UNSW Sydney.

Cover image: Unsplash.